Gaming: So the Arcade is in decline…but what does this mean?
June 12, 2012 11:00 by Leanna Appleby
It is a well-known reality that the popularity of the amusement arcade is in decline. The release of 3D TV, augmented reality, motion sensing and online gaming, to name a few, have taken the in-home gaming experience beyond comprehension, whilst the current economic climate has left gamers unable to cope with arcades’ rising costs. However, perhaps the innovations in technology and the economic climate are not the only reasons for the demise of these venues; perhaps this could also be saying something about the shift in our culture of gaming? Let us take a step back and consider some of the factors.
A brief history…
Thinking back, it seems so long ago when the amusement arcade first appeared. When games such as Space Invaders and Pac-Man were released in the 1970s, their popularity grew with great speed along with the arcades themselves. For some time, the amusement arcade appeared to be on an upward trajectory, a place we all visited with families and friends, and the first venue of choice for gamers seeking to try out newly-released games. Super Mario, released in 1985, is one of the bestselling games of all time, selling a total of 217 million of copies worldwide, whilst another well-loved game, Tetris, remains not too far behind, having sold 175 million. One of the reasons for their great success was the strong emphasis on gameplay. The games focused on the entertainment factor and is a reason for them still being so successful today. However, as technology has evolved and video-game graphics have enhanced, amusement arcades have failed to keep up with the pace of change. The beginning of the 21st century saw a boom in technology and stronger emphasis on in-home gaming became the focus; home games consoles soon delivered the better, high-quality graphic experience rather than the amusement arcade.
Advances in Technology
The precipitous advancement in video gaming technology such as 3D gaming, augmented reality, advanced motion sensing and access to a vast network of online gamers have made the in-home gaming experience better than ever before. From the comfort of their own home, gamers are able to connect to vast social networks of like-minded people, thereby still being able to enjoy the social aspect of gameplay. The 3D gaming and motion sensing technology gives gamers an immersive experience that they are unable to get when they are playing at the arcade (see TechTalk blog on the immersive gaming experience). The Wii Sports for the Nintendo Wii, a video game and console that uses motion sensing controls, hit 7.7 million in its 69th week of sales, whilst the Kinect, a sensor that connects to the Xbox 360 allowing you to be the controller, has sold 10 million worldwide to date, securing a place in the Guinness World Records as the fastest-selling consumer electronics device. Meanwhile, amusement arcade technology has been unable to adapt to support the new and superior video games.
Economic Climate
The current economic climate has also taken its toll on the amusement arcade. Gamers are unable to afford the associated rising costs, and the fact that gameplay is limited is just another deterrent. From 2006-2011 the annual market share figures in amusement arcades declined by 0.6% whilst sales of the home game consoles are continuing to rise; to date, Microsoft has sold over 66.8 million Xbox 360s and the Nintendo Wii has sold over 95.7 million units[1]. Looking at Figure 1[2] we can see the drop in the Amusement Arcades market share between 2004 and 2010. Furthermore, 72% of respondents from the GfK omnibus who stated there was a reason they no longer visit amusement arcades put it down to the rising costs.
Figure 1: Market Share of the Amusement Arcade from 2004 to 2010
Source: http://capcom.co.jp/ir/english/business/market.html#h305
Arcade vs. Home
When arcade video games first hit the scene they were a huge success hitting their peak in 1982, generating $8 billion a quarter (currently the equivalent to $18.5 billion). Interestingly, this was almost twice as much revenue as the $3.8 billion generated by the in-home video game industry. However, the industry has shifted and the in-home game console figures are on a rise. It has been predicted that 190 million households will own a next-generation video console this year[3] and, of that figure, 80% will have that console connected to the internet[4]. Furthermore, when we asked respondents in a GfK omnibus whether they preferred to play video games at home or in an arcade, 98% claimed selected playing games at home as their choice. Preference for in-home gaming is clear and appears to be the current trend. Although the advances in technology and the economic climate are most likely factors of this, the socio-cultural shift in gaming could also be a reason.
Socio-cultural trends
Despite the advancing technology, the economic climate and the arcade vs. in-home experience, there is another factor that could potentially be playing a significant role in this shift. Over time, our need to speak to one another face to face has decreased and online communication and text communication is, for many of us, the first port of call. Advances in technology have increased our ability to do this, such as the development of Facebook and Twitter (there are now more than 800 million active Facebook users and over 100 million active Twitter users). The increased use of emailing, texting and instant messaging has also played a part in this (it has been predicted that by 2016 the number of active worldwide email accounts is expected to reach 4.3 billion). The shift in our socio-cultural behaviour is mirrored in the current gaming culture. The preference for online/text communication is supported within the online gaming technology by allowing the gamer to send text/voice messages during game play or even talk live through VoIP-like technology. Gamers are moving away from real life interactive situations and moving towards virtual interaction which appears now, to be the most preferred, and perhaps it is for this reason that the in-home gaming experience is prevailing.
Conclusion
It is clear that the amusement arcade is slowly losing its appeal at a time when the in-home gaming experience has amplified with technological advancements and access to a vast multiplayer network. With the shift in our socio-cultural behaviour, the future isn’t looking too bright for the amusement arcade. Although there may be some hope for amusement arcades if they lower their price (26% of gamers said they would play at an amusement arcade more often if this was the case), it still may not be enough to convince in-home gaming diehards to visit. It is something that only time will tell.
Sources:
[2] http://capcom.co.jp/ir/english/business/market.html#h305
[3] http://grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=25
[4] http://grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=25
About the author
No related posts.
Tags: Games Console, gaming experience, graphics, Social Networks, technology trends
The decline of the arcade has been a long term inevitability for many years.
I recall that I used to lobe Track & Field back in the 80s, but was always frustrated that you had to start from scratch each and every time. So home video gaming always had the edge over arcades in this respect.
In my youth of course, your choices were limited, sure there was the Spectrum or Atari system at home, but you couldn’t take that with you, meaning that arcades provided that gaming fix on the go. Today, my 9 year old son has a Nintendo DS, my old iPhone and access to an iPad, all of which provide him (and his younger brother) with welcome distraction when waiting for meals etc.
However, ultimately it’s my belief that the ultimate decline isn’t really a technological or even economic problem, but rather due to the changing nature of society. Whereas once, I was allowed to get on the bus into town aged 10, nowadays that doesn’t happen until much later, and with it access to arcades and the social element of that experience has dwindled, or perhaps rather, it’s lost a sizeable age group when compared to the 80s.
OK lets do a rundown of what’s actually going on in the arcade industry these days.
First off the industry report you quote is solely for the JAPANESE market – not the worldwide market or any other region. It also was published quite a while ago.
Second you should do some actual research into the current market (instead of basing your assumptions off of one report and not bothering to look into what arcade games these days are doing) to see that it is embracing new technologies and it can do so before the home market can. In fact it is the perfect place for new technologies to be tested out when they are too expensive for the home market. 3D gaming has not taken off at home as people aren’t convinced that 3D TVs are the way to go not to mention all of those costs involved in getting a proper setup. But before this is out at home, manufacturers have released games using autostereoscopic 3D games such as Disney’s 3D Ping Pong or Sega’s Let’s Go Island 3D. Arcade games were using Kinect like technology back in the 90s (look up Combatica as well as Konami’s numerous motion arcade games released); they are embracing multi-touch large screen displays like Touch FX (which runs Fruit Ninja, Infinity Blade and Flight Control) or the increasingly popular ReRave Arcade or DJ Max Technika 3. Arcades have been using online technologies since the late 90s and many current games use online such as ReRave or the upcoming Big Buck HD which will allow for online tournaments to win cash, Twitter and Facebook postings, real-time site-to-site competitions and friends lists. Golden Tee LIVE 2012 also uses Facebook and Youtube connectivity so the statics cited of users doesn’t work as a valid “arcades are dead” data point. An upcoming Raw Thrills racing game is going to use QR Codes and smartphones to upload scores to any social networking site. Most modern arcade titles use hardware that makes them unique from home games, and approach simulation.
You should look up the recent earnings reports from various Japanese corporations that are involved in arcade developments. If the arcade is on the decline and the future belongs only to home consoles then how is it that companies like Sega, Namco, Taito and others post stronger earnings from their amusement divisions than their home divisions? How come there are still various US based manufacturers that only produce arcade titles like Raw Thrills, Incredible Technologies, GlobalVR, Coast To Coast Entertainment, Adrenaline Amusements, etc.? If arcades are on the decline, why is China exploding with new arcade developments?
These factors should be taken into consideration before writing an entire industry off. They would not be producing new games or selling thousands of them (Terminator Salvation released in 2010 sold over 10,000 units) if the arcade was dead.
Hi Guy, thanks for your comments, you’ve made some interesting points. I do feel the decline is largely due to the change in society and our socio-cultural behaviours, because yes you’re right these behaviours were very different in the 80s.
Hi Adam, thanks for your comments on my article and I appreciate the points you have made. In fairness, I wasn’t attempting to write the entire industry off it was merely an observation that I’ve made over time as watching the big arcades such as Trocadero and Agora Amusements in the UK and Arcade Infinity in the US, close down. I do agree that the situation in Japan is slightly different and there are still many successful arcades in Japan. However, the reports and articles I have read have suggested that the arcades in Europe and America are also showing a decline. Also based on our omnibus research it did show that a large number of people prefer to play games at home as opposed to playing in the arcade. However, as I mentioned in my article this could be due to the change in society as a whole as opposed to the arcade itself. Nevertheless, this is not to say that the arcade does not still have a place, it’s just to say there has perhaps been a cultural shift and a change in people’s gaming behaviours.